Leadership BS: Fixing Workplaces and Careers One Truth at a Time

I had a chance to read an advance copy of this book (and in full disclosure, I endorsed it). This is one of the most important books on leadership that has come out the last decade. Professor Pfeffer of the Stanford Business School is bringing up a central issue on the topic of leadership: how do we know what is effective leadership from practices that aren't? He argues that the entire "leadership industry" as he calls it—management thinkers, executive coaches, CEOs, consultants, executive search firms—often gets it wrong. The title of the first chapter “Why inspiration and fables cause problems and fix nothing” tells you where this book is going. It’s a fascinating read, whether you agree or disagree with Pfeffer's arguments. It gets more provocative: We wish for modest leaders, but many of the best aren’t; we wish that leaders are “authentic” but again many good ones aren’t all the time; and leaders put themselves first (chapter title: Why leaders “eat” first). Backed by research, Pfeffer challenges key conventional wisdoms about leadership. If you’re in the “leadership industry,” this is a must read. If you’re being led by someone, then chapter seven (“Take care of yourself”) is a must read.

Jeffrey Pfeffer, is a Professor of Organizational Behavior at the Graduate School of Business, Stanford University. He is one of those writers on business issues whose books one should not overlook. His books, The Knowing-Doing Gap, and Power, rank high among business books that must be read. This book is a reflection on a serious problem that is very poorly addressed. There are “too many leadership failures, too many career derailments, and too many toxic workplaces… and there is an almost unimaginably vast, list of leadership catastrophes.” Pfeffer asserts. He brings evidence to show that workplaces around the world are, for the most part “filled with dissatisfied, disengaged employees who do not trust their leaders” and that the leaders themselves are failing at ever increasing speed “in part because they are unprepared for the realities of organizational life.” Some 24% of surveyed employees are actively disengaged! Employees are very unhappy with their leaders: with fully 35 percent of U.S. employees reported that they would be prepared to forfeit pay raises just to see their managers fired! Contrast this with the finding by McKinsey that U.S. companies spend about $14 billion annually on leadership development, (that is some R 140 thousand million – even before our currency tanked!) and yet so many workplaces are staffed by disengaged, disaffected, and dissatisfied employees. The leadership industry in most countries is enormous and still growing. It “has failed over its roughly forty-year history to in any major, meaningful, measurable way improve the human condition, (despite) the thousands of leadership books, talks, blogs, classes, and leadership-development programs seeking to make leaders more effective.” Pfeffer notes. This book is Pfeffer’s attempt to explain why so many leaders fail. He draws on solid argument and evidence, as well as well recognized psychological processes to explain this frightful state. “Around the turn of the twentieth century, medical practice and medical education in America were pretty dismal. People were hawking untested and unproven “cures,” dependent more on their slickness and persuasiveness than on the actual science or medical efficacy of what they were pushing,” Pfeffer explains. When this became clear to the medical authorities, they closed 1/3 of the medical schools, began the licensing of doctors and the regulation of the medical profession. This has greatly increased the efficacy of medicines and the practice of doctors. The leadership industry, in its current state “also has its share of quacks and sham artists who sell promises and stories, some true, some not, but all of them inspirational and comfortable, with not much follow-up to see what really does work and what doesn’t,” Pfeffer notes. The parallels between these two industries are striking. Medicine is research-based and adapts and evolves with the growth of peer reviewed evidence. New medicines and techniques are constantly reviewed and revised based on their efficacy. In contrast, the leadership industry lacks this rigour. It does not have clear criteria by which to measure what makes a better leader. “Performance? And if so, over what time period and using what metrics? Holding on to your job as a leader? Obtaining the highest-possible salary for yourself? Moving on to a more prestigious position in another company as quickly as possible? Increasing employee engagement and reducing turnover?” Pfeffer asks. What specific workplace conditions should leaders be held accountable for improving? Why don’t our leadership programmes work? Consider the last one you attended and see how many of these more common attributes were present. “Not only do many of the leadership industry’s participants have no particular qualifications or training germane to their activities, but many also seem to possess little of the interest or intellectual curiosity that would cause them to do the work required to read and learn so as to build their expertise,” Pfeffer asserts. Instead, the leadership development is filled with the retelling of myths and inspiring stories that are “worse than useless for creating change.” There are a number of commonly accepted leadership traits that are taken as almost self-evident truths. These include humility, truth telling, modesty, authenticity and so forth. Pffefer debunks each with clarity and precision, and a single purpose: if we have been teaching that great leaders require these traits and they are not the traits required, that alone is a meaningful contribution to what doesn’t work, even if not yet, what does work. Take the need for authenticity, expressing what you really feel, doing what your feel is right, always and under all circumstances. This is often held up as the mark of a great leader. Pfeffer uses the example of Alison Davis-Blake, Dean of the Business School at the University of Michigan to illustrate his view. Within her first two years, she hired 21 new faculty members, increased undergraduate student numbers by 20%, introduced new master’s programmes, and facilitated raising $100 million for the business school. For any Dean to achieve this, they require qualities much the opposite of Davis-Blake’s introversion and a reluctance to speak. Quite the opposite of “authenticity”, leaders in the real world must be able to put on a show. It would be an error to foster being authentic as a desirable leadership trait. Setting unrealistic expectations for leaders must be a contributor to leadership failure. No, humility is not what make for leaders who deliver, nor is modesty, truth telling, servant-style leadership, and more, Pfeffer argues with cogency and evidence. Leadership BS was written to cause people to “rethink, to reconceptualize, and to reorient their behaviors concerning the important topic of leadership… it encourages everyone to finally stop accepting sugar-laced but toxic potions as cures.” Pfeffer’s call for accurate and comprehensive data, and development back-up by standards and measurements, that are made visible through charts, has the potential to do for leadership what it did for medicine. Readability Light -+--- Serious Insights High +---- Low Practical High ----+ Low Ian Mann of Gateways consults internationally on leadership and strategy

I just wanted to say thank you Jeffrey for a wonderful book on leadership. You have validated almost everything I witnessed in my past career as a consultant and director. I have always maintained that you have to lie, steal and cheat to get to the top and once there, continue to do this to stay there. Unfortunately or possibly fortunately, I never gave into to those and found myself where I started, back as a staffer in the government. I felt compelled to write to you because as I finished your book I was sitting in the concierge lounge of a Marriott listening to two older and very distinguished gentlemen discuss how they could "control" and "manipulate" their next venture to make a tremendous amount of money. In a way, they and so many other CXO / leader types I have met in my life are exactly as you describe and as I finished your book I reminded myself that you don’t have to be like that to be a good or even successful leader. I guess that is why so many people that have worked for me over the years often remind me that I am more of leader than I know. Again, thanks for reminding me what a true leader really is and giving me some extra tools to add to my leadership bag.

Leadership BS: Fixing Workplaces and Careers One Truth at A Time is a great title. Is Jeffrey Pfeffer’s book as great as the title? I don’t think so, but it could be a great book for you. Start by understanding three things before you plunk down your hard-earned cash for this one. This is a rant, not a reasoned presentation. The author has points he wants to make, and many of them are important, but don’t expect to hear the other side unless it’s in a derisive tone. When Pfeffer uses the term “leader” it refers to a senior leader or CEO in a large company. He makes some points that apply to leaders in other situations, but this is a book for people who aspire to senior leadership in a giant corporation. If you’re a front-line leader in any size company, or if you’re a leader in a small company, be wary of some of Pfeffer’s advice. Before I get to my third point, let me describe what Pfeffer says is the purpose of the book. It’s at location 2015 in the Kindle version “But by ignoring the evidence, the social science facts about deception, or, for that matter, any other topic pertaining to leadership, by pretending that common behaviors aren’t really that common, we miss the important opportunity to understand the social world as it is—the first step on the road to changing it.” There may be one purpose, but there are really two books here. If you’re thinking about buying and reading Leadership BS, you should be attracted to one or the other, or both. A Book About What’s Wrong with The Leadership Industry The first and last chapters of the book concentrate on what’s wrong with the leadership industry. There are a lot of important points here. Take, for example, the fact that the effectiveness of leadership training is mostly measured by participant satisfaction surveys. There’s very little follow-up to see if the training made any difference on the job. And there’s very little evidence to support many of the prescriptions promulgated by leadership gurus. Those, and many other points, are important and hardly anyone else is making them. If you want a good critique of the current leadership industry with some ideas about how things could get better, read the first and last chapters. You may or may not want to read the rest of the book. A Book About “Real Life” Chapters two through seven are about real life, the way it is and not the way we think it ought to be. I remember earlier in my career that I was puzzled by some of the things that happened around me. I thought that people should act a certain way, and many of them didn’t. That’s what chapters two through seven of this book are all about. Chapter two, for example, is about why leaders aren’t modest. And chapter three is about authenticity, whatever that means. There’s a discussion of whether leaders should tell the truth and another one about trust. For my money, this part of the book is more about human nature than it is about the leadership industry. The observations are all accurate and they conform to Pfeffer’s statement of what the book is about, but I don’t think you’ll find many surprises or penetrating insights. There may be value here for you, but I think that Machiavelli did it better and in fewer pages. Bottom Line If reading a rant bothers you, or if you’re put off by the seeming assumption that the only leaders worth writing about are in large, corporate environments, or you think that a book about how things are in big corporations isn’t relevant for you, don’t buy or read this book. You’ll just get angry and feel like you’ve wasted your time and money. On the other hand, this can be a great read if you want a clear-eyed view of the leadership industry and its prescriptions. You’ll find that in chapters one and eight. If you find yourself puzzled by things that are happening around you in the workplace, chapters two through seven might be a good read for you.

I'd give it 6 stars had they been available. Iconoclastic analysis delivered with a style reminiscent of Lewis Lapham. I reviewed it on my KHIT.org blog, where I rant a lot on "leadership" issues in the fractious health care space (an arena rife with dystopian, Machiavellian BS). After I finished I bought my wife a hardcopy for her convenience. She's a C-Suite exec at the top of her game, an adroit survivor of the shark-infested corporate waters, a woman Corporate Director of Quality in a construction and engineering firm. She probably could have written this book. Midway through I recall thinking "uh-oh, are we gonna go all Hoover Institute here?" No. In the end, the book is hardly ideological. It's actually quite balance and humane. My only minor reservation is the author's claim that the book is "scientific." Citing myriad studies is a good and necessary thing. Whether this rises in the aggregate to scientific "meta-analysis" is another matter. The findings are "qualitative" to a great degree, and the risks of "confirmation bias" and "publication bias" remain a potentially nagging question. Still, there are myriad eye-rolling examples of irony, paradox, Dlibert-Zone wrong-headedness and, well, BS. I recall thinking of the joke about DC. It applies to corporate environments as well. "If you want a friend (in the workplace), get a dog." All of the cherubic chatter about the humanistic-value leadership "oughts," corporate cultures remain largely transactional, future-oriented, and carnivorous. No one gives a flip about what you've accomplished. What matters is the assessment of your future value. And notwithstanding that you may be in a collegial "Just Culture" today, it will likely not remain so. Shorter Pfeffer: "Keep Your Ear to the Ground, and Your Powder Dry."

I am in the Biotech and Pharma industry and have seen so much leadership BS in organizations big and small. What they tell you is not how they are conducting business, even where human health is concerned! I tried speaking up, but got into trouble or was pushed into a corner (at companies like Roche Molecular Diagnostics). It would literally eat me on the inside as to why things weren't making sense, or why most people continue to brown-nose the BS artists that called themselves leaders (like at Roche Molecular Diagnostics). I honestly felt validated in every single observation that I have made of these so-called 'leaders' and the subservient followers. I am at peace. I think I now know what to do to navigate the extremely toxic work organizations where people who have no business calling themselves leaders, over promote themselves. Thank You Dr.Pfeffer. Wish I had heard about your work sooner.

This book is very much to the point and interesting. Some of the interesting things that this book mentions are as follows: A lot of what people claim about leadership is based more on hope than reality. Many times leaders fail themselves, their customers, their stockholders, and their employees. No human being is without fault. All human beings are imperfect. The book mentions that with about $7000 George Zimmer in 1973 founded the Men’s Wearhouse. In 2011, when George Zimmer had reached his early 60’s in age, he and the Board promoted Doug Ewert, a longtime employee to be CEO as George Zimmer stepped into the role as Chairman of the Board Of Directors. In June 2013, George Zimmer was summarily fired. He was thrown out of the company he founded. Employees at the Anchorage, Alaska Men’s Wearhouse walked off the job to express displeasure with the Board’s removal of George Zimmer. The Men’s Wearhouse paid higher wages than a lot of other retail stores. Companies sell out, leaders retire or die, and the new people in charge aren’t the same as the old, particularly in how they relate to and treat employees. If people see they will not get sufficient recognition for good work because the leaders hog all the credit, they may reduce their efforts.

I first came across Pfeffer's work in a business school class in roughly 2000 or so. I am not exaggerating when I say that "Managing with Power" has helped my career greatly. His most recent work may well have a similar impact, at least for me. "Leadership BS" effectively captures a concept that is absolutely prevalent in today's business world. Who among us cannot look around us and see poor leadership? Perhaps a look in the mirror might even cause us to cringe at times. Whereas I agree with some of the words in the negative reviews, I can't help but coming back to a simple truth. I agree with Jeff. In fact, some of the naysayers actually seem to reinforce his point with their comments - reading something that is negative is not uplifting. The sober truth rarely is, unfortunately. If you internalize the lessons, this book may well change your career. It won't, however, make you feel better as you walk into that next all day offsite on leadership at your workplace. Concepts like those expressed in Jeff's book are bound to inspire a couple of ratings of one or two, as these ideas are polarizing. That's okay. I recommend that potential readers spend some time with this material regardless. Quite frankly, you will probably be better off reading this book even if you completely reject Pfeffer's entire premise. Just as philosopher Herbert Spencer taught, "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which can not fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance-that principle is contempt prior to investigation."

Yes, the leadership industry is faked. So what? What are we leaders supposed to do? The book offers not that much advice after somewhat artificially probing the leadership fallacies. I was eager to get to the final chapter where I was expecting advices to counter attack all leadership B.S. The advices are common sense and very few in quantity and poor in quality.

Takeaways from reading the book Problems with leadership: - Page 4: Research by Barbara Kellerman, Harvard's Kennedy school, shows that in the past 40 years, the leadership industry has failed to improve the human condition in any major, meaningful, measurable way. - Page 11: Studies show that 40% experience bullying at work. Bullying leads to stress and has negative effects on both physical and mental health. - Page 12: A study by Mercer with 30,000 people globally shows that between 30% and 50% want to leave their jobs. - Page 12: A study by Gallup of 142 countries shows that only 13% are engaged in their work. - Page 13: A poll of the US workforce shows that 35% would willingly forgo a substantial pay increase in exchange for seeing their direct supervisor fired. - Page 15: Summarizing numerous research studies, Bill Gentry found out that 50% of leaders are incompetent. - Page 18: A survey of 1,300 people around the world showed that 40% left their jobs because of their leader. - Page 114 and 118: Research shows that leaders lie because lying helps them get ahead and attain powerful positions. Research consistently demonstrates that powerful people lie more often and with more ease. - Page 100: Research shows that people's attitudes and behaviour are profoundly affected by the situations in which they are embedded. The self changes in response to the individual's environment. Authentic leadership may be impossible to do. - Page 106 and 117: Research shows that people view lying as one of the gravest moral failings. However, lying is very common among leaders of all sorts of organizations. In the USA people lie, on average, 1.65 times a day. Many lies are told to avoid tension and conflict. - Page 178: Research shows that people show more concern with the future than repaying past kindnesses. Problems with leadership education: - Page 14: 10% - 15% of graduates from top business schools are fired within the first couple of years after graduation. Reason: They believe in the world described to them in business school. Consequently, they are surprised and completely unprepared for the reality they meet in companies. Telling leaders, directly or indirectly, that they fail to live up to expectations of good leadership stops their careers at the respective companies. - Page 27: Research shows that leadership development programs do not measure results. Most evaluations of leadership development focus on whether people are having a good time. There is a very small correlation between student evaluations and learning. Measuring entertainment value produces great entertainment, not change. To measure results of leadership development, we need to measure the change in trust and satisfaction people have in those leaders. Also, we need to measure to what extent people become more engaged when their leaders participate in leadership development.

Scary in the reality of what we are doing isn't working, sad that looking after #1 is the message to take away.

This is one of the most important books on leadership I have read and like many of you reading this I have read a lot. I found myself saying repeatedly "you know all this"..."you've experienced that"..."you've made that mistake too"..."if only I'd worked this out at that time and responded in that way.." This morning just as I write this review I see a piece published by Gail McGovern, CEO of the US Red Cross, "What Corporate America can learn from non-profits" again full of the "usual leadership b.s. stuff." I almost forgot that this is the same organisation who employed aggressive legal tactics in responding to freedom of information requests as to how it spends the publics' donations. It is a competitive world we live in - that's just basic human nature and it will always be so. That is why this book is essential reading for todays aspiring leadership candidates and hopefully for older dogs like myself it is not too late to learn! I only wish I had it twenty years ago starting my career.

Hard facts, lots of references, well based rational to every affirmation and - if you wish - hints of Machiavellianism? - or just taking the role of being the leadership industry's Cassandra?; I'd better leave that to your judgment. Anyway, a refreshing point of view and a much needed polemist in the face of so much wishful thinking we see every day with regards to this topic.